Agenda Profile: Jaak Valge
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Organizing a referendum on the question of electricity production from oil shale" (581 OE)
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is on organizing referendums and improving legislation, which is considered necessary to elevate the level of the debate surrounding energy issues. The need to prepare for snap elections is also emphasized, and criticism is leveled at Estonia's lagging use of referendums compared to the rest of Europe. Support is given to the draft referendum on oil shale energy, although the probability of it being voted down is acknowledged.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the organization and legislation of referendums, citing the experiences of Switzerland and Ireland regarding the provision of balanced information. They are also knowledgeable about Estonia's historical position on referendums during the interwar period and the practice of European energy referendums. The low quality of the energy debate is identified, and a referendum is proposed as a solution to elevate the level of discussion.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is analytical and moderately critical, especially concerning the primitiveness of the previous energy debate. Comparative arguments are employed (Switzerland, Ireland, Europe), and questions are raised aimed at improving legislation and procedures. The tone is formal, focusing on political procedures and the quality of legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu session, posing questions during the first reading of the draft bill. The need to take action is mentioned in connection with the approaching snap elections, indicating a focus on political activity in the immediate future.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is aimed at the low level of the energy debate and the political opposition, which is likely to vote the bill down. The future positions (specifically regarding the 2026 timeline) of those who voted against the bill in the committee are also being questioned. Opponents are urged to do something substantial before the snap elections arrive.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is direct and demanding; the speaker thanks the presenter of the draft bill, but simultaneously calls for substantive work to be done in preparation for the upcoming snap elections. Questions are directed at the rapporteur to assess his and his party's long-term preparedness for organizing referendums.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and international comparison (Europe, Switzerland, Ireland). There is no specific regional emphasis.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on the organization of referendums and the necessity of amending the related act (the Referendum Act). The objective is to ensure citizens receive balanced information prior to referendums. The speaker supports the draft bill for the oil shale energy referendum.
2 Speeches Analyzed