Agenda Profile: Toomas Uibo
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (528 SE) – first reading
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is currently directed towards the work culture and efficiency of Riigikogu members, highlighting the significance of these issues. The speaker adopts a cautiously critical stance regarding the draft bill, raising doubts about the consistency and flexibility of its implementation. The criticism is primarily aimed at the internal conduct of the faction that submitted the bill, as well as the inadequate regulation of extra-parliamentary work necessitated by global crises.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The presenter demonstrates expertise regarding internal parliamentary procedures, specifically focusing on participation in committee work and the regulation of absences among Riigikogu members. Furthermore, the necessity of accounting for non-parliamentary duties, stemming from widespread international crises, is emphasized. This expertise is evident in the procedural questions raised concerning the internal logic of the draft legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speech is formal and courteous, utilizing the salutations "Dear Presiding Officer" and "Dear Rapporteur." The style is analytical and centered on questions, presenting logical and procedural challenges. Emotional appeals are not used; instead, reliance is placed on fact-based criticism (referencing the faction members' previous irregular participation).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participated in the first reading of Draft Bill 528 SE, addressing two specific questions to the rapporteur. This indicates involvement in important legislative debates concerning the internal organization of the parliament. Information regarding broader activity patterns is currently unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the bill's sponsors, criticizing the insufficient participation of their faction members in the work of the Riigikogu, particularly within the committees. The criticism is procedural and centers on a lack of consistency, suggesting that the bill's sponsors are not adhering to the work culture they themselves promote.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is in direct dialogue with the rapporteur of the draft bill, posing clarifying questions. Data regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-factional communication with colleagues is absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed towards the internal organization of the Riigikogu and international crises that require the activity of parliament members outside the chamber. There is no reference to specific local or regional topics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data. The only social context is a reference to "numerous global crises" that affect the work arrangements of Riigikogu members.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on Draft Act 528 SE, which proposes amendments to the Status of Members of the Riigikogu Act, specifically addressing work culture and efficiency. The speaker adopts the role of a critical interrogator concerning the bill, aiming to clarify the extent of its regulatory reach in the performance of both domestic and foreign duties.
1 Speeches Analyzed