By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotionally charged, employing intense language such as "robbery" and "pure madness." The speaker makes a strong appeal to morality and justice, underscoring the negative impact of the government's actions on impoverished citizens. The style is direct and focuses on the consequences of the policy.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the presenter, yet simultaneously sharply critical and provocative. The argumentation relies on logical appeal, utilizing the authority of economic experts and rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the government's understanding of its own policy.

The speaker's rhetorical style is direct and combative, utilizing powerful emotional appeals, such as characterizing the tax as outright robbery of ordinary people. While the format is formal (addressing the session chair and colleagues), the content includes sharp political challenges and clear logical justifications for voting against the tax. The main emphasis is on convincing the audience that modifications will not salvage the fundamental nature of the tax.