By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and sharply critical, emphasizing the injustice and absurdity inherent in politics. The speaker employs strong contrasts (market economy vs. socialism) and demands fundamental change, stressing that mere cosmetic measures are insufficient. The opening of the speech respectfully acknowledges the fairness of the Chancellor of Justice's proposal.

The style is direct, well-argued, and at times combative, especially when the competence of the government is called into question. It employs both logical arguments (referencing European countries, emphasizing facts) and emotional language, describing expensive food as a "luxury item" and stressing the need for solidarity in tax policy.

The speaker's style is concrete and logical, emphasizing the proposal's simplicity and clarity, and favoring brevity. Both emotional appeals (humane reasons) and rational economic arguments are utilized, asserting that even a schoolchild understands the usefulness of the proposed solution.