By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political position is highly critical of the current e-voting system, highlighting procedural uncertainty (specifically, the proving of voluntariness) and a fundamental conflict of values. The speaker calls into question the system's democratic legitimacy, as it resembles those employed in Russia and Venezuela—countries that Estonia itself criticizes for their lack of democracy.

The political focus centers on the electricity price crisis and energy independence. The speaker strongly opposes the current free market model, accusing it of profiting speculators, and demands a return to the state-regulated prices of 2013 and independent supply based on oil shale. This stance is heavily policy- and results-driven, criticizing the failure of promises made during previous market reforms. Skepticism is also voiced regarding the construction of wind farms, as they fail to guarantee supply security when the wind is calm.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's actions and competence in managing finance and the economy. The criticism is primarily performance-based, highlighting the government's alleged lack of control over state finances and the vagueness of its economic policy. The speaker also casts doubt on the ministers' ability to govern the country, citing their contradictory and responsibility-dodging statements.