By Months: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

Adopts a strongly conservative stance, demanding an end to spending taxpayer money on promoting the "rainbow agenda." Expresses concern about internal security regarding detainees arriving from Sweden, questioning their background (Swedes versus migrants) and the capacity of the Estonian prison system.

The primary social issue is poverty and economic insecurity, which is being addressed as a widespread crisis. Emphasis is placed on the struggle of thousands of people to make ends meet and pay their utility bills.

The text emphasizes the necessity of guaranteeing a decent standard of living and boosting social expenditure, while simultaneously criticizing the inadequacy of minimum income support and the chronic underfunding of the healthcare system. Additionally, it defends the canonical ties of the Orthodox Church, condemning the government's efforts to restrict the church's operations as mere "labeling" and a breach of the principles of the rule of law.

In social matters, the position is strongly in favor of increasing social expenditures, criticizing Estonia for being among the last in Europe regarding the level of social spending. It opposes cutting unemployment benefits at the expense of caregivers of children and students, noting that this equates pursuing education with serving a sentence for a crime. It demands that benefit recipients should not have to live in poverty, and that people with health insurance should not have to wait years to access a doctor.

The primary social issue is the trustworthiness of e-voting and democratic procedures. The politician casts doubt on the verification of the voluntary nature of the voting process and highlights the contradiction that Estonia employs a system found only in Russia and Venezuela.

On social issues, the speaker holds conservative moral views, criticizing the content of state-funded Russian-language media (specifically mentioning pornography and swinger clubs) as well as the lifestyle of its editors. He opposes collective punishment via the disenfranchisement of non-citizens, deeming such action unconstitutional. Furthermore, he defends the Orthodox Church from government attacks, citing both religious freedom and historical injustice.

The speaker highlights social inequality, noting that tens of thousands of people are forced to cut back on food due to high prices. Furthermore, he/she defends the Orthodox Church against political interference, referencing historical context and canonical issues, and stresses the importance of religious freedom.

The key social topics are public health (specifically, preventing people from being forced to work while ill) and the accessibility of food products, which have become luxury goods due to rapid inflation. Furthermore, an attempt was made to raise the issue of closing institutions subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate, referencing the appeal made by advisor Indrek Tarand.