Agenda Profile: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to state intervention in citizens' private lives, particularly in the area of child protection. The speaker opposes Bill 427 SE, arguing that it strengthens state control and grants excessive authority to officials. This position is clearly value-driven, aiming to protect the role of parents from being usurped by the state.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is cautionary and emotional, utilizing a strong value-based framework that emphasizes the threat posed by the state to the traditional family. The speaker employs scare tactics, referencing the negative "Scandinavian model," where the state destroys families.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the state’s growing control and a bill that grants child protection officials overly broad powers. The criticism is intense and values-driven, warning against state interference that could destroy normal families.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation and international comparison, citing the "Scandinavian model" as a negative example.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In social issues, the focus is on protecting the traditional family model and opposing the placement of children with same-sex foster parents. The speaker emphasizes the protection of civil liberties against excessive state intervention in private life.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is the strong opposition to Bill 427 SE (Draft Act on Amendments to the Child Protection Act and other Acts). The speaker aims to block the passage of the law, arguing that it increases state control over private life.
1 Speeches Analyzed