Agenda Profile: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The situation in the country

2024-11-06

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

Political Position
The political position focuses intensely on the internal procedural fairness and equal treatment within the Riigikogu. The speaker sharply contests the perceived marginalization that occurs when compiling the queues for the information hour. This stance is motivated by personal injustice and limited opportunities to speak, which calls into question the impartiality of parliamentary standards.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the internal procedures of the Riigikogu, especially concerning the compilation of the information hour queue and the frequency of opportunities to speak. He/She is able to accurately track his/her previous speaking turn numbers and frequency. Data is lacking concerning other political topics or technical details.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is suspicious and plaintive, framing a feeling of personal injustice as a formal procedural matter. The tone is direct and accusatory, suggesting possible personal disfavor on the part of the list compiler. The speaker draws a comparison with previous media experience to underscore their feeling of being ignored.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker meticulously monitors their activity patterns, noting their frequency of appearance ("only twice" during the season) and sequence numbers (eleventh, twelfth). This points to an aspiration to be active in parliamentary information sessions, despite perceived obstacles. The pattern indicates regular, yet limited participation.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opposition is aimed at the organizers of the Riigikogu procedures (the Speaker or advisors), who are suspected of personal bias and compiling an unfair agenda. The criticism is both procedural and personal, calling into question the motives of the decision-makers ("I don't know who compiles the queue for the information hour").

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient information.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient information.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient information.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient information.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
There is a lack of legislative focus, with attention centered only on the Riigikogu’s internal procedures and opportunities for speakers to participate in the information hour. The priority is access to speaking slots, not the initiation or support of specific draft legislation.

1 Speeches Analyzed