By Plenary Sessions: Vilja Toomast

The speaker supports the procedural advancement of Bill 590 concerning the ratification of the document amending the Constitution of the International Labour Organization (ILO). This position is clearly procedure-centric and policy-based, focusing on the smooth execution of the Riigikogu's rules of procedure. The proposal to move the bill to the final vote demonstrates strong support for its ratification.

The political position is procedural and informative, focusing on the processing of the draft ratification of the amendment to the Constitution of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Practical aspects of the draft are highlighted, such as the benefits of membership for Estonia and potential financial obligations, while maintaining a neutral, policy-based approach. The position is aimed at supporting and clarifying the ratification process.

The speaker, presenting the lead committee's position, strongly supports the proposal to reject the draft amendment to the Penal Code concerning the repeal of the provision banning symbols of aggression. This stance is politically motivated by the necessity of protecting peace and public order in the context of Russia's ongoing war of aggression. It is a position firmly rooted in policy and values, which is consistent with the stance of the Government of the Republic.

The political stance is one of strong support for the draft legislation initiated by the Government of the Republic to amend the Penal Code, which stipulates the doubling of the fine unit and the fine rates. The objective of the bill is emphasized as modifying behavior toward greater law-abidance and disciplining the populace, rather than merely collecting revenue. This position is rooted in policy and values, highlighting the critical importance of upholding the law and accountability.

The speaker supports the proceedings regarding the amendment to the Penal Code (increasing the fine unit), having voted in favor of placing the draft bill on the agenda and concluding the first reading. His position is politically driven by the historical rationale of the legislation and the necessity of aligning the fine unit with the growth of the average wage since 2001. He emphasizes that increasing fines should primarily encourage adherence to the law, rather than merely serving as a tool for budget fulfillment.

The political position is strongly procedural and focused on legislative drafting, emphasizing the modernization of the Imprisonment Act and related procedural legislation. The views of the Ministry of Justice are supported, and efforts are made to resolve practical issues raised by the Chancellor of Justice, such as excessive solitary confinement. These positions are primarily policy- and administrative-based, ensuring the consistency and enforceability of the laws.

The political position strongly supports the expedited handling of the draft law concerning the ratification of amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. This stance is grounded in both policy and procedure, emphasizing the technical regulatory accuracy of the draft and the thoroughness of its preparation. There is a complete absence of any opposition or criticism regarding the substance of the draft.