Session Profile: Madis Timpson
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-05
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the draft legislation regarding the mandatory implementation of a data monitor, stressing its alignment with the coalition agreement and its objective of increasing public credibility. The political direction is policy-driven, focusing on the accelerated implementation of solutions targeted by the government. Furthermore, the reversal of the provision concerning the public disclosure of debtors' personal data is also being addressed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the work of the Legal Affairs Committee and procedural minutiae, addressing the legal aspects of implementing the data tracker and the notification duties of investigative authorities. He accurately conveys the minister's responses concerning the history of the legislative amendments and the rules of procedure, citing current legislation and fundamental statutes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The register is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on conveying the substance of the Legal Affairs Committee session and the procedural decisions to the Plenary Assembly. The style is logical and fact-based, relying on the reporting of the Minister's responses and the Committee's decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's pattern of activity is linked to the work of the Steering Committee, presenting reports to the plenary on the committee's sessions and procedural decisions. He/She refers to a specific committee meeting held on October 20th and the scheduling of the draft bill discussion for November 4th.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No direct confrontation is expressed, but the speaker neutrally references critical questions raised by colleague Peeter Ernits concerning the timing of the implementation of the data tracker and the reasons for reversing the provision regarding the public disclosure of debtors' data. The criticism is aimed at the details of the policy and the procedure.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is consensus-based, as all procedural decisions (taking up the agenda, concluding the reading, appointing a representative) were made by consensus within the committee. Good cooperation with the minister is also emphasized; the minister provided a comprehensive overview of the draft legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, the focus is on increasing the state's trustworthiness in connection with making the data monitoring mechanism mandatory and informing individuals about investigations carried out concerning them. The draft bill also addresses the reversal of the provision concerning the public disclosure of debtors' personal data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the processing of the Legal Affairs Committee's draft bill, which concerns making the data tracker mandatory and reversing the provision regarding the public disclosure of debtors' personal data. The speaker is a proponent and the representative responsible for the proceedings, who is currently working on finalizing the first reading.
2 Speeches Analyzed