Session Profile: Madis Timpson
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
2024-10-17
Political Position
It focuses on the legislative procedure and the bill's previous progress in the Riigikogu. The political stance is inquisitive, attempting to understand why the bill previously failed to gain support and whether new circumstances justify its resubmission. The approach is procedural rather than value-based.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker frankly admits they are new to the Riigikogu ("This is my first time in the Riigikogu") and therefore relies on the presenter's knowledge to explain the history of the draft bill. The speech does not demonstrate specific, in-depth knowledge of the topic; instead, the speaker seems to be seeking background information.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and courteous, addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur with respect. The tone is inquisitive and procedural, focusing on the logical explanation and the facts concerning the bill's previous failure. Direct questions are employed, requiring a concise and fact-based response.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is a new member of the Riigikogu, a fact that has also been explicitly stated. Their pattern of activity indicates participation in the plenary session by posing questions to the rapporteur, specifically focusing on clarifying the legislative history of the draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is open to cooperation and receiving input, asking the rapporteur to briefly explain the history of the draft bill and any new developments. The tone is respectful and seeks assistance, indicating a readiness to accept information.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main focus is on the legislative history of the specific draft bill and the justification for its repeated submission to the Riigikogu. The speaker is acting as an information gatherer and a requester of procedural clarity in order to understand the bill's previous impediments.
1 Speeches Analyzed