Agenda Profile: Madis Timpson
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position regarding the Draft Amendment to the Competition Act (609 SE) is moderately supportive, noting that "this way works too," but emphasizing the need for further amendments. The stance is policy-driven, focusing on the legitimate objective of fair punishment and the avoidance of procedural errors. The speaker acknowledges the compromises made when the previous version was submitted.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative drafting and governmental compromises, having personally introduced the previous version while serving as minister. The technical focus is on competition law, criminal law (amendments to the general part of the Penal Code), and procedural matters, especially the risk posed by the statute of limitations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, professional, and self-reflective, acknowledging the shortcomings of the earlier draft. The appeal is logical and focuses on the technical improvement of the legislative bill, directly posing a question to the Minister regarding the risk of the statute of limitations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of action encompass participation in the Riigikogu debate and a reference to the former ministerial role, during which he/she introduced the previous version of the draft bill last year.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct opposition, as the speaker supports the overall objective of the bill. The criticism is directed at the procedural inadequacy of the draft, as it fails to include the necessary amendments to the General Part of the Penal Code.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperative approach is open to compromises, recognizing that the previous draft was already a compromise agreed upon by the government. Hope is expressed that the necessary amendments to the Penal Code (KarS) will be introduced during the legislative process of the bill, which signals a readiness for collaboration.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic stances center on the regulation of competition law and ensuring that fair penalties are imposed for violating market rules. This indicates support for a regulated and responsible market environment.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft bill amending the Competition Act (609 SE). The speaker is a supporter who calls for the bill to be improved with amendments to the general part of the Penal Code (KarS), emphasizing the importance of avoiding procedural risk (the statute of limitations).
1 Speeches Analyzed