Agenda Profile: Madis Timpson
Draft law (496 SE) for amending the Social Welfare Act and the Act Regulating the Provision of Health Care Services (regarding the provision of independent nursing care in 24-hour special care services) - First Reading
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
Political Position
The speaker positions themselves as a neutral procedural rapporteur, focusing on conveying the discussions and decisions of the Social Affairs Committee regarding Draft Bill 496 SE. The substantive issues highlighted by the committee included the sustainability of the Health Insurance Fund’s financing, wage agreements for healthcare professionals, and the increase in co-payment for special welfare services. The speaker declines to express a personal viewpoint in this official capacity, strictly adhering to a non-political framework.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the legislative process, accurately detailing the committee's proceedings, participants, and consensus decisions. He/She meticulously conveys the issues raised by committee members concerning the funding of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa), service pricing, and salary components, serving as a conduit for expert opinions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The language used is formal, informative, and strictly procedural, focusing on conveying the facts regarding the commission’s work. The tone is neutral and devoid of emotion, carefully avoiding personal judgments or emotional appeals. The speaker repeatedly stresses that he is only reporting what was discussed within the commission, refusing to disclose his personal opinion even to a party colleague.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's activity profile is linked to legislative work within the Social Affairs Committee, specifically participating in the preparation of the draft legislation for the first reading. The presentation covers the committee meeting held on September 24 and the report delivered to the plenary session on October 9.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasized the strong cooperation and consensus within the Social Affairs Committee, noting that all procedural decisions concerning the draft bill (including the conclusion of the first reading) were adopted unanimously. He also referred to a party colleague, stating that he is ready to discuss the matter with them outside of his official role as rapporteur.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker raised concerns regarding the sustainability of the Health Insurance Fund's budget and financing, stressing the necessity of monitoring expenditures closely and avoiding the use of reserves to cover ongoing operational costs. Furthermore, the need was highlighted to ensure that the cost of the Health Insurance Fund's services aligns with the salary figures agreed upon during collective bargaining.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social focus is on the organization and funding of specialized care services and healthcare services. An important topic is also the salary issue for care workers and nurses, as well as the possible 10% increase in the co-payment for specialized care.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the amendment of the Social Welfare and Health Services Organization Act (Bill 496 SE), which concerns autonomous nursing care in the provision of special care services. The speaker is the official rapporteur for the lead committee at the first reading, supporting the consensual conclusion of the bill's proceedings.
2 Speeches Analyzed