By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The speaker is focusing on systemic global risks, such as climate warming and population growth, alongside the national administrative burden. They clearly support the European Union's plan to cut bureaucracy by 25% to alleviate the burden on both the state and businesses. The political framework is geared toward finding practical and long-term solutions, particularly in the area of environmental planning.

The political stance centers on the issues of funding for science and education. The speaker casts doubt on the bill’s assertion that it will not incur financial obligations, stressing the necessity of ensuring adequate funding to support the best talent in the scientific sphere. This is a moderate, policy-driven, and results-based approach.

The political focus is heavily directed towards foreign and security policy, particularly the support provided by European Union countries to Ukraine. The speaker is interested in comparing Estonia's contribution with that of other EU partners and is seeking the head of government's assessment regarding the likely increase in support in the near future. This line of inquiry is primarily aimed at policy effectiveness, seeking clarity on the future directions of international aid.

The political stance is moderately supportive of reducing the administrative burden, which is viewed as "highly positive." The focus is on the policy's effectiveness, emphasizing the positive impact on smaller sports organizations. This position aims to improve efficiency and alleviate bureaucracy.