Session Profile: Urve Tiidus
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-10-22
Political Position
The political position centers on questions concerning the previous government period (when the Centre Party was in power) and the history of legislative drafts. Focus is maintained on political continuity, or the lack thereof, by posing a challenging question to the speaker. This is rather a framework directed toward performance and historical context.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of legislative history and the Center Party's previous terms in government. This expertise is evident in the ability to pose a specific question regarding the year a similar bill was submitted, which indicates a grasp of the details.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and polite, utilizing respectful forms of address ("esteemed chairman," "esteemed presenter"). However, the question itself is challenging in substance, aimed at refreshing the presenter's memory, and focuses specifically on facts and chronological consistency.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Only one appearance at the plenary session, in the form of asking a question, is known.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is directed at the presenter, from whom an explanation is demanded regarding the Center Party's previous activities in government. The criticism targets political consistency and the timing of the bill's submission, being rather procedural and political-historical.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward the history and consistency of bill submissions. The speaker is acting as an auditor of previous legislative initiatives, requiring clarification regarding the year the proposal for adopting a similar law was submitted.
1 Speeches Analyzed