Agenda Profile: Urve Tiidus
Bill for Amending the Liquid Fuel Act (622 SE) - Second Reading
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political stance is strongly geared toward advancing the draft amendment to the Liquid Fuel Act (622 SE) without modifications. This position is both procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing consensus and the initiator's satisfaction with the current form of the bill. The speaker strongly supports the swift referral of the bill for a final vote.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The expertise is clearly evident in the realm of legislative procedure and committee work, bringing forward specific dates (June 5, May 28) and procedural decisions. The speaker demonstrates authority regarding the deadlines for submitting amendments and the process of notifying stakeholders. While no substantive analysis on the fuel topic is provided, the depth of knowledge concerning the stages of the bill's proceedings is comprehensive.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, substantive, and procedural, focusing on the communication of facts and deadlines. The discourse is logical and neutral, avoiding emotional appeals and repeatedly emphasizing the commission's consensus decisions. The vocabulary is characteristic of legislative language and is direct.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The mode of operation involves coordinating legislative work and the activities of the committee (the Economic Affairs Committee), particularly focusing on preparing bills for their second reading. The speaker is actively involved in setting the procedural timetable for the bill and informing the plenary session, proposing specific dates (June 18) for the final vote.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no oppositional stance; rather, the opposite is emphasized, given that members of the Riigikogu, factions, or interest groups did not submit any amendments. The speaker notes that the initiator of the bill likewise sees no need to amend the bill, which indicates a lack of opposition.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperative style is highly consensual and accommodating, repeatedly stressing the need for a "consensus decision" within the committee regarding the draft bill's further procedure. This cooperation also involved informing stakeholders and considering the viewpoints of the initiator and other parliamentary groups, which ultimately resulted in no amendments being proposed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is the swift and consensual processing of the draft amendment to the Liquid Fuel Act (Bill 622 SE). The priority is to conclude the second reading and hold the final vote on the designated date (June 18), given that no amendments were submitted. The speaker is acting in the capacity of a supporter and coordinator of the procedure.
1 Speeches Analyzed