By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Tein

The style of cooperation is visibly collegial, as the draft bill is being submitted by the individual and 15 other members of the Riigikogu. This suggests a readiness to consolidate support behind a specific legislative initiative.

The collaborative approach is formal and focused on seeking clarification, referencing previous work within the commission and addressing the rapporteur directly. The aim is to receive confirmation regarding the correctness of the procedure and the mitigation of risks before the final vote.

The speaker is participating in a direct dialogue with the minister, posing a question in the form of a proposal. There is insufficient data regarding cooperation with other Riigikogu members or political parties.

The collaborative style is respectful and seeks the Minister's confirmation and support for the new direction. This is an open question, indicating a readiness for discussion and finding solutions. The speaker emphasizes that this is assistance that would also contribute to the work of other colleagues.

The speaker emphasized successful cooperation with the coalition partners (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats) within the working group focused on attracting private funding, which resulted in the creation of a joint financial plan. They expressed openness and satisfaction regarding the inclusion of the opposition in the discussions, noting that political will is necessary to reach a positive decision.

There is no data available regarding cooperation with political colleagues. However, the speaker actively promotes collaboration with private healthcare, seeing this as a solution for greater efficiency and cost optimization.

The speaker referenced the party's (Eesti 200) shared stance against supporting the bank tax, highlighting internal cohesion. The dialogue with the rapporteur is constructive, focusing on finding ways to develop the sector and establish better conditions for all stakeholders. The ultimate goal is to find a shared path toward enhanced competition.

The speaker referenced cooperation or a previous discussion, noting that the question was prompted by an idea or query from Anti Poolamets, thereby demonstrating a readiness to build upon topics raised by colleagues.

There is too little data.

The committee’s discussion is described as constructive and driven by the importance of the subject matter. It is proposed that the topic of involving private funding be added to the agenda of the Culture Committee, demonstrating an openness to discussing new solutions and fostering cooperation. Reference is made to close communication between committee members and representatives of the ministry.

The collaborative style is appreciative and constructive, expressing satisfaction regarding the Minister of Culture's readiness to engage private funding. Common goals are emphasized, such as realizing the economic potential of sport and promoting health. The speaker thanks the Minister for the substantive presentation.

There is insufficient data.

The cooperation style is institutional, stressing work within the Culture Committee and the subsequent submission of its joint decision to the Riigikogu. This demonstrates a willingness to operate within parliamentary structures and adhere to committee decisions.

Cooperative, addressing the Prime Minister respectfully, and seeking opportunities to expand successful policies into other sectors. The reference to the discussion in the Culture Committee demonstrates a readiness for practical cooperation with other members of parliament.