By Months: Tanel Tein

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on asking questions and demanding detailed calculations ("Has such a calculation actually been done?"). The tone is pragmatic and directed towards economic results and the benefit to the state budget, avoiding emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is formal and structured, characteristic of a committee rapporteur who first summarizes the debate and subsequently offers their own views. The tone is constructive and solution-oriented, primarily emphasizing fiscal reality and logical arguments (e.g., why the old funding system failed). He uses comparisons (e.g., the pension system model) to clarify new ideas.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and logic-based, adhering to the problem-setting and resolution structure inherited from the private sector. The tone is constructive, yet it stresses the urgent necessity of reforming inefficient systems (e.g., the tax law concerning donations). Extensive data and examples are utilized to substantiate the arguments.

The rhetorical style is highly formal and procedural, utilizing proper forms of address (Mr./Madam Chair, esteemed Minister of Foreign Affairs, distinguished members of the Riigikogu). The speech is direct and neutral, focusing either on posing specific questions or clarifying the substance and background of the draft legislation. Emotional or personal appeals are absent.

The style is formal and interrogative, addressing the Prime Minister with a constructive proposal. Logical argumentation is utilized, highlighting a successful historical model (science funding five years ago) and inquiring about its potential in other sectors. The tone is moderate and solution-oriented.