By Months: Tanel Tein

Total Months: 10

Fully Profiled: 10

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
09.2025

2 Speeches

There is no information about any confrontation or criticism.
Details View Details
06.2025

2 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed at the procedure and the risks, questioning whether stakeholder involvement has been adequate and whether the dangers associated with the legislation have been sufficiently mapped out. The opposition is procedural rather than political.
Details View Details
04.2025

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed more at structural and procedural shortcomings, such as the slow progress of sports-related issues and the heavy workload of the legal department. Specific political opponents or groups are not criticized.
Details View Details
02.2025

11 Speeches

There is no direct criticism of opponents, but the speaker criticizes past policy that has left the development of sports vulnerable to political turbulence and focused only on one-off decisions. The country's financial situation is also criticized ("the national purse has had a big hole in it"), along with the current inability to support new ideas.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

The speaker takes an oppositional stance regarding the plans to build a major hospital, questioning its necessity. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on whether alternatives (private healthcare) have been sufficiently considered.
Details View Details
10.2024

4 Speeches

There is direct opposition to implementing the bank tax because it sends a negative signal to the banking sector and could reduce Estonia’s potential for attracting new banks. The criticism is aimed at the policy’s economic inefficiency and the lack of proper analysis (the failure to calculate various scenarios).
Details View Details
05.2024

10 Speeches

Opposes the Centre Party’s (Belobrovtsev) proposals to restore the cut subsidies, defending the Ministry of Culture’s decision to channel the funds directly to the sources. The criticism is policy-based, accusing old umbrella organizations (EKSL, Jõud) of inefficiency and an outdated approach that focused solely on young people who were already active. He/She also casts doubt on claims that the termination of funding came as a sudden surprise.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation with political opponents, but the criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of current systems and laws. In particular, the system for supporting major investments and the failure of the tax-exempt donation law to function are criticized. The criticism is policy-driven and of moderate intensity.
Details View Details
02.2024

2 Speeches

Insufficient information
Details View Details
01.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling