By Plenary Sessions: Tarmo Tamm

Insufficient Data Set

The cooperative approach emphasizes active participation in European Union processes and international collaboration aimed at ensuring a level playing field among member states. There is also a mention of the possibility of utilizing grants established by the Swiss government, which signals an openness to receiving assistance from foreign partners during the transition period.

The style of cooperation is open and respectful, acknowledging the presenter's work and posing questions constructively to gain clarification. Communication is aimed at sharing knowledge and eliminating regulatory ambiguity.

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with stakeholders (the Estonian Shipowners' Association, Viru Chemistry Group, the Power Plants Association) during the Environment Committee meetings. He/She supports the government's balanced approach, where the CO2 tax is compensated by crew wage support and environmental measures. He/She considers the compensation measure a reasonable way to take with one hand and give with the other.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial, emphasizing that all important procedural decisions (placing the draft bill on the agenda, concluding the first reading, appointing a representative) were made unanimously by the committee. It refers to an active question and answer session in the committee, in which the majority of members participated.

The speaker demonstrates a pragmatic willingness to cooperate by explicitly supporting the draft legislation, despite the fact that it was introduced by the opposition. He calls upon all members of the Riigikogu to support the bill, emphasizing the necessity of finding a swift solution.

The speaker emphasized cooperation, referencing the consensus reached during the discussion, and affirmed a willingness to revisit the topic in the commission two years from now. The approach is open to compromise and the ratification of agreements.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by presenting the consensus decision of the Economic Affairs Committee, in which 7 members supported the motion and only 1 remained neutral. Emphasis is placed on shared goals, such as avoiding inconvenience for users and reducing the burden on officials when implementing the new procedure.

They begin in a collaborative manner, stressing the common priority ("a clean environment is a priority for all of us"), before raising their question about economic imbalance. This indicates a readiness for constructive dialogue.

The speaker emphasizes the strong cooperation and consensus-based approach utilized by the Economic Committee during the processing of the draft bill. It was decided by consensus to conclude the first reading, which demonstrates a readiness for compromise and for finding shared solutions. The style of cooperation is pragmatic, focusing on finding the best solution (a suitable IT solution).

The speaker urges all colleagues to support the draft bill by pressing the green button, which signals the desire to achieve broad-based support for the acceleration of administrative processes. The style of cooperation is open and inclusive, aimed at securing cross-parliamentary support.

The style of cooperation is polite and dialogue-oriented, involving respectful communication with the rapporteur in order to obtain substantive information. There is no information regarding the search for broader coalitions or compromises.

The speaker urges colleagues to reject the draft bill, stressing the necessity of a unified political decision to avoid measures that would harm the economy. He addresses the chamber to achieve consensus in the vote against the proposal. There are no direct references to cross-party cooperation.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial. The speaker emphasizes that all decisions in the Economic Committee regarding sending the draft bill to the plenary session and adopting it were made unanimously.

The cooperation style focuses on the internal unity and accountability of the public sector, demanding that every politician and official consider the impact of their decisions on economic growth. It is emphasized that the public sector must drive innovation, as it possesses the necessary resources and societal interest. There are no specific references to cross-party cooperation.

The style of cooperation is consensual and effective, emphasizing that the members of the commission approved the submitted draft without additional questions or debate. This points to successful collaboration between the government (the Minister) and the commission.