Session Profile: Tarmo Tamm
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-11
Political Position
The political position is one of moderate support for raising the limit by 50%, representing the stance of the Eesti 200 party. The issue is approached from a policy perspective, focusing on specific numerical changes and future plans, including a potential further increase of 20% in two years.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the legislative process and technical details, citing specific numerical values (50%, 20%) and referencing the discussions taking place in the committee regarding the threshold limit.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and explanatory, centered on logical confirmation and verifying mutual understanding through the use of questions. The tone is neutral and procedural, intended to ensure the accurate comprehension of the agreed-upon conditions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasized cooperation, referencing the consensus reached during the discussion, and affirmed a willingness to revisit the topic in the commission two years from now. The approach is open to compromise and the ratification of agreements.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The stance relates to raising the threshold (50% and 20% in the future), which signals a willingness to modify economic or regulatory barriers. A numerical adjustment is favored, consistent with the agreement reached during the discussions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on raising the threshold and confirming the future legislative action plan (which is scheduled for discussion by the commission in two years). The speaker is a supporter and confirmer of the agreed-upon process, emphasizing the commission's role in the future debate.
1 Speeches Analyzed