By Months: Tarmo Tamm

Total Months: 12

Fully Profiled: 12

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
09.2025

33 Speeches

The style is formal and procedural, particularly during the introduction of the draft bill, where technical and legal arguments dominate. When responding to questions, the style shifts to confident and defensive, refuting the opposition's claims (such as those concerning retroactive taxation) using legal analysis and factual evidence. Direct rebuttals are employed, accusing opponents (Urmas Reinsalu) of confusing the facts, yet the overall tone remains balanced and focused on logic.
Details View Details
06.2025

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal, factual, and exclusively informative, focusing on the objective conveyance of the content and decisions made during the environmental commission's session. The tone is neutral and procedural, avoiding emotional appeals. Logical arguments and data (forecasts, percentages, legal clarifications) are utilized to summarize the commission's work.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is both empathetic and critical, highlighting the moral and material damage suffered by rural residents and the state's failure to provide assistance. It employs both logical arguments (the necessity of legislative change) and emotional appeals (fear of wolves, wolf hatred, loss of trust). The discourse is formal, yet it contains sharp criticism directed at the disproportionate sentencing practices and the short-sighted large predator policy.
Details View Details
12.2024

2 Speeches

The style of the speech is formal, substantive, and procedural, reminiscent of a commission report. The emphasis is on logical argumentation, referencing studies and court decisions, and the goal is to neutrally convey the results of the commission's work. The tone is rather explanatory and questioning (in the second speech in December), not emotional.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

The style of the discourse is analytical, framed as a critical question intended to highlight an existing imbalance. Logical argumentation is employed, supported by data concerning Estonian environmental and economic indicators. The tone is one of concern and caution, referencing a "minor threat" in the current situation.
Details View Details
10.2024

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and informative, being typical for a report detailing the outcomes of a committee meeting. Logical appeal is employed, focusing on facts, the progression of the proceedings, and the consensus that was achieved. Emotional or personal appeals are absent.
Details View Details
09.2024

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal, optimistic, and persuasive, addressing colleagues respectfully. Both logical arguments (such as the reduction of bureaucracy and outdated requirements) and emotional appeals are utilized, emphasizing that a happy person makes for a better and more loyal citizen. The text concludes with a clear call to vote in favor of the bill.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal and courteous, employing salutations such as "Respected Chairman!" and "Dear Presenter!" The tone is inquisitive and constructive, focusing on the logical question concerning the feasibility of the economic plan and the necessary priorities.
Details View Details
05.2024

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is analytical, logical, and cautionary, focusing on explaining the long-term negative consequences of taxation. The speaker uses strong and emotional language, calling the proposal populist and warning against the state's "hairy hand" reaching into the entrepreneur's pocket. The overall tone is formal and centered on rational arguments.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

The style is predominantly formal, logical, and strategic, focusing on the necessary steps and solutions. The economic address is rather urgent and visionary in tone, stressing that "we have no reason to wait." Later presentations are dry and focus on procedural details, presenting factual dates and commission decisions.
Details View Details
03.2024

1 Speeches

The style is formal and procedural, addressing the chairperson and colleagues. The tone is positive and conciliatory, emphasizing consensual approval and the good quality of the report, utilizing descriptions such as "exhaustive, thorough, and good."
Details View Details
Back to Profiling