By Agendas: Tarmo Tamm

Insufficient data

Supports regulations that are economically beneficial, promoting the transition to a bioeconomy and a cleaner environment. Considers it important to ensure stability and equal competitive rules for Estonia's larger shipping companies in other member states. Supports market-based solutions that allow for the reduction of fees by transitioning towards lower emissions.

Economic perspectives are tied to financial regulation and the business environment, stressing the need for clarity regarding the management and ownership rights of corporate assets (the funds held in their accounts).

Supports regulation that creates a level playing field for all EU companies, considering it a reasonable strategy. It advocates for state compensation (wage subsidies and €25 million in environmental support) for shipping companies to mitigate the impact of the new tax and prevent vessels from flagging out to other jurisdictions. It views the tax as a measure subject to phased reduction, which incentivizes businesses to become more environmentally sustainable.

Economic perspectives are pragmatic and regulatory, concentrating on the financial implications of the EU environmental requirements (HKS) for the shipping sector. Concrete forecasts are provided for the potential revenue of the Estonian state (15 million euros) and the corresponding costs for the shipping sector (8 million euros), based on a unit price of 60 euros.

The economic perspectives focus on protecting rural life and the life’s work of livestock farmers from damage caused by large predators, highlighting significant material losses (exceeding 100,000 euros). State inaction is also criticized, as it exacerbates the economic and moral damage, and intervention from the government is demanded to normalize the situation.

Economic considerations support raising regulatory thresholds, which indicates a desire to adjust financial requirements and potentially reduce the administrative burden. The focus is on fiscal and regulatory detail.

Supports government intervention to compensate commercial carriers for their losses, deeming 50% reimbursement fair. It emphasizes fiscal control and transparency, demanding that payouts be based on verified data rather than a formula.

Economic perspectives center on the necessity of boosting GDP, particularly in rural areas, coupled with the worry that environmental protection measures have resulted in economic imbalance. There is a perceived risk that gains made in environmental protection have come at the cost of economic growth, suggesting a strong desire to identify solutions that actively foster economic development.

The economic considerations center on fulfilling state obligations (a cost of 4 million euros) and ensuring regulatory clarity within the public transport sector. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of developing an effective IT solution for managing the compensation payment scheme.

The economic views are distinctly pro-business and focused on reducing regulations, stressing that quicker administrative processes actively support entrepreneurship. This draft legislation is linked to the hope of jump-starting the economy and boosting business confidence.

The speaker strongly supports the goal of aggressive economic growth (doubling the economy by 2035). They emphasize the need for specific measures and focus to achieve long-term growth, which points to a growth-oriented perspective.

He/She strongly advocates for entrepreneurship and economic growth, stressing the necessity of a stable tax environment and robust investment. They are firmly against retrospective taxation and state interference in profits, viewing such actions as sources of instability. As an alternative to taxation, they propose a market-based solution (purchasing shares) or nationalization (for example, buying out Swedbank).

Economic perspectives support the ratification of international air service agreements, which indicates support for international trade and connectivity. Other specific positions regarding taxes, regulations, or fiscal discipline are absent.

The economic outlook is strongly focused on growth and investment, emphasizing the critical importance of corporate profitability, given that growth stems from investments and investments stem from profit. It advocates for reducing regulations and positioning the public sector as the engine of innovation. Support is given to targeted state contributions in business diplomacy and priority sectors, which must align with the Green Deal.

Not enough data