By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Tali

The tone is generally serious, pertinent, and at times urgent, particularly concerning security and sanctions issues. The speaker employs both logical arguments (such as reducing bureaucracy) and a strong moral framework (referencing the aggressor state and corruption). The presenter defends the work of the National Defence Committee and criticizes the practice of political populism, while also acknowledging that, as a "young politician," they are still learning the ropes of parliamentary work.

The rhetorical style is urgent, decisive, and slightly provocative, especially when responding to the opposing side. It balances logical arguments (the urgent need for legislation) with an emotional emphasis on the responsibility owed to the public and the survival of the state. The speaker uses metaphors ("a live-fire exercise") and references (the war in Ukraine) to illustrate their position.

The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and insistent, stressing the continuous nature of battles in cyber and information space ("battles are happening all the time"). The speaker employs logical arguments and real-world examples (Ukraine, GRU attacks), while simultaneously establishing an alarming connection between digital failure and the direct threat of kinetic war on Estonian territory.