Session Profile: Rain Epler
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-11
Political Position
The speaker highlights concern over the expansion of the European Commission's central power, adopting an opposing stance on the matter. Furthermore, he expresses skepticism regarding the energy and industrial policy driven by the dominant zero-emission ideology in Europe. These positions are aimed at the value-based defense of national sovereignty and economic policy and have been presented to the Supreme Court candidate in the form of questions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence regarding the role of the Supreme Court institution and the complexities of statutory interpretation, highlighting how personal opinion influences decisions when the law is ambiguous. Furthermore, they are well-versed in European Union political trends, particularly concerning the European Commission's centralization efforts and the energy and industrial policy driven by the zero-emission ideology.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and direct, focusing, when posing questions, on eliciting the candidate's personal opinion rather than just the institutional stance. The tone is serious and concerned, particularly regarding the political directions of the European Union, which are described as "aggressively pushing" centralization. A logical appeal is employed, highlighting the tension between the law and personal interpretation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The records indicate attendance at the Riigikogu plenary session in November 2025, during which a substantive political question was posed to the Supreme Court nominee. Furthermore, a brief technical inquiry was raised concerning the technical arrangements of the session.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opposition stance is directed at an external power—the European Commission—which is criticized for the aggressive expansion of central authority. They also oppose the zero-emission ideology that guides European energy and industrial policy, which is presented as a continually prevailing, yet questionable, direction.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed towards national institutions (the Supreme Court) and international/pan-European policies, such as the centralization of the European Commission and energy and industrial policy. Regional or local focus is absent.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives are evident in the criticism of energy and industrial policy driven by the zero-emission ideology, which signals concern over the impact of current environmental regulations on industry. This suggests a preference for economic policies that are less constrained by stringent climate targets.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on assessing the suitability of candidates for the Supreme Court, highlighting the critical importance of interpreting statutes in ambiguous situations. Furthermore, there is an implicit desire to curb the European Commission's regulatory scope and influence the trajectory of energy and industrial policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed