Session Profile: Rain Epler

Strong opposition to the government's policies, particularly the cuts to social benefits and tax hikes that undermine the sense of security for families with children. The primary issues are the demographic crisis and supporting the birth rate, with critics stressing that the government’s measures (such as abolishing large family benefits and raising taxes) are counterproductive. Fierce criticism is also leveled against the procedural correctness of public administration and the political appointment of high-ranking officials. The political focus is thus both value-driven (supporting families) and procedural (adherence to the rule of law).

Demonstrates awareness of the links between social policy and demography, citing the actions and trends of the Finnish government. It raises specific questions regarding the financial impact of draft legislation on Local Authorities (KOV) and the absence of necessary budget coverage. Furthermore, knowledge of public administration and legislative procedures is highlighted, criticizing the proactive measures taken by ministries prior to the law entering into effect.

The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and deeply concerned, particularly regarding demography and family security, where the minister is pressed for a direct answer. Strong emotional and negative analogies (such as "banana republic") are employed to criticize the appointment procedure for senior officials and the overall unethical optics. The style remains formal, yet it includes pointed accusations of demagoguery and evasion of questions.

All interventions were made during a single plenary session, which indicates active participation in the debates concerning questions and draft legislation. The pattern demonstrates consistent challenging of the minister's responses and the submission of repeated questions when the initial answer was vague or evasive.

The primary opposition is directed at the government and the responsible minister, who stands accused of using rhetoric and avoiding direct questions. Criticism targets both political decisions (cuts, tax hikes) and ethical and procedural issues (such as changing the requirements for the State Secretary). The situation where a top official participates in coalition negotiations and subsequently laws are changed to allow them to take a new post is criticized particularly sharply, with critics labeling it a "banana republic" practice.

There is no direct cooperation visible with other political parties, but the calls are directed at the Speaker of the Riigikogu, demanding that a memorandum be sent to the government to correct the legislative procedure. The oversight function regarding the government dominates, rather than the search for compromises.

The focus is primarily on national socio-political and economic issues. Specific concern is also raised regarding the financial burden on Local Governments (LG) due to new legislative amendments, demanding concrete figures and state budget coverage. An international comparison is used, referencing the demographic activities of the Finnish government.

It strongly opposes the government's tax hikes (VAT, car tax) and cuts (benefits for large families, income tax exemption). It finds that these measures negatively impact the economic security of families with children and their willingness to have more children. It supports a fiscal policy that enhances the sense of security for families.

The central social theme is the demographic and birth rate crisis, emphasizing the need to increase families' sense of security through social benefits and tax incentives. Previous decisions are being criticized, such as the cancellation of health insurance coverage for mothers who stay at home.

It focuses on changes to parental benefits, cuts to social welfare, and amendments to the qualification requirements for the Secretary of State. It is a strong opponent of government bills that reduce support for families or make the appointment of senior officials more flexible. It demands strict adherence to legislative procedures to ensure that ministries do not implement measures before the law enters into force.