Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
Suffrage
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Political Position
The political position is strongly procedural, emphasizing the necessity of free debate and the right of members to pose questions. The speaker vigorously opposes the session chair's interference in the framing of questions and the restriction of the topic (voting rights), deeming such actions inappropriate. This stance is value-based, defending the core principles of democratic deliberation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates authority concerning parliamentary procedure and the rules of the information hour, criticizing the presiding officer's actions. They can distinguish between relevant and irrelevant interventions and defend the appropriateness of the topic (voting rights), referencing the minister's reply.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is confrontational, critical, and straightforward, using strong expressions such as "the smart remark was inappropriate." The speaker employs irony, describing the session chair's ideal information session as pre-scripted "theater." The appeal targets both logic (the necessity of debate) and emotional protest against unfair treatment.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker attended the parliamentary information session or a sitting, intervening in a procedural dispute. Information regarding regularity or other activities is unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is with the session chair, whose actions in restricting questions are deemed inappropriate and improper. The criticism is directed at procedural unfairness and personal interference ("pontificating"). The speaker suggests that the chair’s behavior could lead to the parliament turning into a mere theater.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker expresses support for and defense of colleagues (Aller, Solman) whose questions the presiding officer of the session attempted to restrict. This indicates a readiness to defend the colleagues' rights in parliamentary procedures and to support their right to ask questions on the topic of voting rights.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary socio-political issue addressed is suffrage, the necessity of debating which the speaker strongly defends. However, the speech itself does not clarify the speaker's substantive position regarding whether the right to vote should be changed or maintained.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on adhering to the Parliament's Rules of Procedure and the procedures for the Q&A session, rather than initiating or supporting specific legislative bills. The objective was to ensure that free debate could take place and that the relevance of the questions was acknowledged.
1 Speeches Analyzed