Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
Question Regarding the Financing of Cultural Buildings of National Significance (No. 600)
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position focuses heavily on the procedural organization of the Riigikogu (Parliament) and the accountability of ministers. The speaker opposes the actions of the Riigikogu Presidium, accusing them of penalizing obstruction and restricting the rights of members of parliament. The primary emphasis is placed on the improper functioning of the government and ministers, particularly the disregard for deadlines when responding to interpellations, which is framed as paralyzing the work of the Riigikogu.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) Rules of Procedure and procedural regulations, referencing specific deadlines (January 17, March 7) and data available in the information system. The professional focus centers on the proper handling of interpellations and ensuring ministers fulfill their obligation to respond. Furthermore, the speaker references knowledge of Supreme Court rulings concerning the restriction of parliamentary members' rights.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and demanding, while simultaneously emphasizing a calm delivery to avoid retrospective discussion. The speaker employs logical arguments, relying on specific dates and procedural facts, to accuse the board of punishing the deputies and poorly organizing the work. The tone expresses concern regarding the efficiency of the Riigikogu's work.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively exercises parliamentary oversight, having sent an interpellation to the Minister of Climate on January 17th and closely monitoring the response deadlines. This pattern of activity demonstrates a swift reaction to irregularities and a readiness to raise procedural questions during agenda debates.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary adversaries are the Riigikogu Board and the Minister of Climate, who are being criticized for their lack of accountability and for failing to meet deadlines. The criticism is aimed both at procedural shortcomings and political retribution, specifically accusing the Board of penalizing members for obstruction and restricting the rights of parliamentarians.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on the national level, addressing the internal organization of the Riigikogu (Parliament), the formation of the agenda, and ministerial accountability. Specific regional issues are not covered.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the effectiveness of parliamentary oversight mechanisms, requiring strict adherence to the deadlines for responding to interpellations. The speaker emphasized the need to urgently address an overdue interpellation—the response deadline for which was March 7th—due to the brevity of the current agenda.
2 Speeches Analyzed