Agenda Profile: Rain Epler
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position strongly favors nuclear energy, which is considered the unrivaled best technology for electricity production in terms of energy return, environmental footprint, and safety. The stance is politically oriented toward state control, demanding a majority state ownership in the planned nuclear power plant to increase public support. The speaker is a member of the EKRE faction and emphasizes their loyalty.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a deep understanding of energy issues, using technical criteria (energy return on investment, environmental footprint, safety) to highlight the benefits of nuclear energy. They are familiar with both the types of nuclear power plants (modular reactors vs. large plants) and the background discussions surrounding the draft legislation in committees and hallways. They claim that proponents of wind and solar power are either lying or haven't bothered to look into the details.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is confident, straightforward, and at times aggressive, accusing opponents of lying or being ignorant. It employs both logical arguments regarding energy cost-effectiveness and emotional/critical appeals, such as using the Estonian proverb "omad vitsad peksavad" (one's own rods beat one) for procedural criticism. The overall tone is optimistic about the future of nuclear energy but critical of the lack of political compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the sessions of the Riigikogu, presenting both substantive positions and procedural questions regarding the clarity of the vote. Earlier long and detailed speeches on the same topic are mentioned, as well as participation in background discussions in committees and corridors concerning the draft legislation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition is directed at proponents of wind and solar energy, who are being labeled as ignorant or liars spreading disinformation. Procedural criticism is being leveled against colleagues Izmailova and Maran. Furthermore, the compromise offered by the Reform Party (Mario) is criticized; this compromise involved disregarding the proposed amendment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaboration is focused on securing both supporters and faction members to broaden the societal base of support for nuclear energy. Openness to compromise was demonstrated via an amendment proposal, but the failure of the compromise offered by the Reform Party—which involved disregarding the proposal—was highlighted.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national energy sector and energy networks, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive, state-controlled system. The example of Võru's district heating is briefly mentioned to illustrate the flexibility of ownership structures for smaller projects, but the overall emphasis is at the national level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views stress state control and ownership of energy systems, especially concerning larger projects, whether achieved via a majority holding or full state ownership. The preference for nuclear energy is justified by its unrivaled energy viability.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social focus is aimed at addressing the misinformation and lack of knowledge circulating in society regarding nuclear energy, which is generating hesitation and skepticism. The goal is to dispel public doubts and increase support, especially by ensuring the state maintains a majority stake.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is supporting the Riigikogu's decision to move towards the adoption of nuclear energy. A specific priority was the parliamentary group's amendment proposal regarding guaranteeing a state majority stake in the nuclear power plant, the disregard of which is being criticized.
3 Speeches Analyzed