By Plenary Sessions: Kristina Šmigun-Vähi

Insufficient dataset

The style of cooperation is direct and probing, yet it begins by acknowledging the minister's stance ("quite right"), indicating a willingness for constructive dialogue concerning the specifics of the policy. The objective is to ensure improved implementation of the draft law through clear regulations.

The collaborative style is consensual and oriented towards compromise. It is emphasized that all amendment proposals from the leading committee received consensual support within the committee. Cooperation was carried out with officials from the Ministry of Finance and the Board of Auditors, and the final solution was a compromise suitable for the initiator (the Isamaa faction).

The style of cooperation is consensual and appreciative. The speaker emphasizes the committee's unanimous decision to proceed with the handling of the draft bill and recognizes the colleague (Mart Maastik) for his substantive introduction. The cooperation is aimed at fast and effective lawmaking.

The collaborative approach is inquiry-based, focused on direct dialogue with the minister to obtain information and advance local-level prevention activities. The speaker is seeking solutions that necessitate cooperation between the government and local authorities.

Not enough data

The cooperation style is formal and inquiry-oriented, involving direct communication with the minister to obtain clarifications and information regarding the measures. The approach is non-confrontational, focusing on identifying solutions and plans.

Insufficient data.

The speaker stresses cooperation, highlighting the success achieved in opening schoolyards with Tallinn's coalition partners (including the Reform Party). They also advocate for cross-party support for elite sports, noting that, "It doesn't matter what political party you belong to, we always root for our own."

The style of cooperation is consensual and inter-institutional, emphasizing that all procedural decisions and proposed amendments received unanimous support within the committee. Cooperation was close with representatives from the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Defence, and the Defence Forces. This demonstrates an openness to accepting proposals from the ministries and a clear preference for a consensus-based decision-making process.

The collaborative style is consensual and cooperation-oriented, emphasizing that all three procedural decisions concerning the draft law were adopted unanimously by the committee. He/She works closely with ministry officials and the Minister of Finance, relaying their explanations.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the preceding discussion by referencing the previous speaker, who also addressed children's rights, which indicates effective coordination of topics and a continuation of the debate.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, citing the encouragement of the President of the Bank of Estonia to put the same question to the head of the Financial Supervision Authority. This suggests a desire to resolve the problem through inter-institutional dialogue and adhere to the officials' recommendations.

The address highlights the necessity of coordinated and systematic action at the local level, engaging local governments and communities in boosting physical activity. Collaboration with county sports associations is favored, given that they possess the best contacts and expertise for regional initiatives. Cross-party cooperation is not referenced in the submitted documents.

The working style is open and information-seeking, respectfully approaching the presenter and asking them to share information regarding the debates and recommendations that took place within the expert council. The speaker's objective is to gain input for making strategic decisions.

He/She prefers a constructive approach, praising the fact that Estonia has not "dug its heels in," but is making an effort and establishing the framework. This signals a readiness for cooperation and support for existing processes, provided they are aimed at progress. Communication with the rapporteur is respectful and inquisitive.

The speaker respectfully addresses the minister and seeks a national solution ("what we must do as a state"), signaling a readiness to cooperate in achieving public health objectives.

The speaker strongly supports cooperation, praising the inter-ministerial work concerning children and youth issues. Communication with the minister is constructive and involves presenting a questionnaire, seeking solutions for motivating healthy behavior.

Insufficient data.

The speaker addresses the Minister of Education directly, presenting their idea in the form of a question, which signals a desire to initiate a dialogue and consider collaboration in improving the education system. The style is open and geared toward discussion.

The style of cooperation is respectful and constructive, expressing gratitude to the presenter and the session chairman. This demonstrates a readiness to participate in information gathering and discussion within the legislative process.

The speaker strongly emphasizes collaboration, especially among local municipalities (parishes) in providing extracurricular education and sharing resources. He views inter-municipal transport and service sharing as a "lifeline" for optimizing resources. This demonstrates a pragmatic and solution-oriented approach to administrative problems.