By Plenary Sessions: Timo Suslov

The style of cooperation is constructive and supportive, acknowledging the amendments presented by the minister. However, it calls for additional analysis and transparency, directly asking whether the issue has been discussed in the government’s economic cabinet, with the goal of improving the justification of the draft bill.

The cooperation style is consensual and inter-institutional, emphasizing close engagement with the Ministries (Justice, Finance, and Defence). All proposals submitted by the ministries received unanimous support within the commission, which indicates an openness to compromise.

The style of cooperation is consensual and open, emphasizing that all decisions of the steering committee (placing on the agenda, concluding the reading, appointing a representative) were made by consensus. He/She also highlights the cooperation with Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta during the presentation of the bill’s content.

The collaborative style is consensual and collegial, stressing the unanimous support of the committee members for the proposal. The contribution of the Chancellor of Justice and the substantive nature of the discussion are also acknowledged. The speaker further mentioned the procedural cooperation that led to the appointment of a new representative (Timo Suslov).

Cooperation is evident at the committee level, where decisions regarding placing the item on the agenda and appointing the rapporteur (Timo Suslov) were made by consensus. However, it is stressed that the motion to reject the draft legislation resulted from a vote (6 in favor, 4 against), which points to structured disagreements.

The collaborative style is evident in the committee's work process, where the designation of the representative for the lead committee was a consensual decision. This points to a willingness to cooperate with colleagues on procedural issues, despite disagreements regarding the substantive support for the draft legislation. The speaker references the positions of both the initiator and the government representative.

The style of cooperation is institutional and procedural, emphasizing work within the committee, where the positions of the government representative (Martin Kulp) were heard. The procedural decision concerning the inclusion of the draft legislation on the agenda was consensual, which indicates a readiness to find common procedural solutions.

The style of cooperation is formal and institutional, involving work in the Constitutional Committee together with representatives of the Ministry of Justice. This collaboration resulted in a clear majority decision to reject the draft bill, demonstrating the capacity to achieve consensus among the committee members. The speaker themselves was appointed as the committee's representative.