Session Profile: Timo Suslov
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
2025-03-12
Political Position
The central topic is the proposal to amend the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act by introducing a financial coercive measure for ministers who fail to attend committee meetings. The speaker, representing the majority of the committee, supports rejecting the draft legislation (6 votes in favor, 4 against), arguing that existing measures (such as the procedure for expressing a vote of no confidence) are sufficient. The stance is procedural and centers on proportionality, questioning whether a financial penalty is warranted.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates authority regarding the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and the legislative process, providing precise details on the committee debate, the voting results (6:4), and the decisions made. Their specialized knowledge pertains to the history of amendments to the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, the absence of implementing acts for previous amendments, and the constitutional procedure for motions of no confidence in ministers.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is highly formal and procedural, fitting the role of the commission's rapporteur. The speaker concentrates on logical and factual arguments, delivering the commission's decisions and the substance of the discussion in a neutral tone. It is repeatedly stressed that personal opinions must be avoided, and the focus must remain on the commission's official position to ensure the presentation's impartiality.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was active during the plenary session on March 12, 2025, serving as the rapporteur for the leading committee. This pattern of activity includes participation in the legislative process and committee meetings (notably on February 18th), where a serious discussion regarding the draft bill took place.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the bill, who want to impose a financial penalty for ministers failing to attend committee meetings. The criticism is both procedural and ideological, raising questions about whether such a coercive measure is proportional and necessary, especially considering existing remedies, such as the option of calling a vote of no confidence.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperation is evident at the committee level, where decisions regarding placing the item on the agenda and appointing the rapporteur (Timo Suslov) were made by consensus. However, it is stressed that the motion to reject the draft legislation resulted from a vote (6 in favor, 4 against), which points to structured disagreements.
16 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available
16 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
16 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available
16 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is the amendment of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. The speaker, as a representative of the lead committee, supports the rejection of the draft bill, emphasizing that the existing conditions for holding ministers accountable are sufficient and a financial coercive measure is not necessary.
16 Speeches Analyzed