By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu

The style is formal and respectful when addressing the expert, who is thanked for an "outstanding and excellent presentation." However, the tone is critical and accusatory when referencing previous governments, who are blamed for "ultra-populist decisions." The speech is structured around a logical framework of questions based on the solutions presented by the expert, in an attempt to elicit concrete recommendations.

The rhetorical style is provocative and question-driven, employing strong emotional appeals to cast doubt on the opposing side's arguments. The speaker presents a series of loaded questions which ironically imply that opponents of nuclear energy consider the Finns and Swedes to be irresponsible.

The style is formal, analytical, and focused on questions, addressing the presenter respectfully. The tone is businesslike, but includes an urgent appeal for European partners to take action ("to get moving"). Logical argumentation is used, emphasizing the critical importance of investments for security.

The style is formal, serious, and persuasive, focusing on geopolitical necessity and legal responsibility. Logical arguments are employed to justify Estonia's pioneering role in the implementation of sanctions and the utilization of assets. The address concludes with a direct call to vote in favor of adopting the draft bill.