By Plenary Sessions: Kalev Stoicescu

The style is authoritative and persuasive, employing strong emotional expressions ("grossly violated," "brutally behaved") when describing human rights violations. The argumentation is built upon a logical appeal, drawing on international obligations and personal experience. The speech concludes with a direct question to the interlocutor concerning the future of Georgia.

The style is formal, procedural, and analytical, especially regarding the report of the steering committee, where reliance is placed on protocols and legal opinions. When presenting the faction's position, the tone becomes more strategic and cautionary, utilizing figurative comparisons (the Surovikin Line, the struggle for survival) and emphasizing the seriousness of security threats. Overall, logical and fact-based argumentation dominates.