By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on sharp criticism of the government's inaction and its economic failures (nine consecutive quarters of recession). Key positions include strong resistance to centralized heritage protection bureaucracy and the proposed cuts to funding for extracurricular activities for families with many children. The overall approach is results-driven and values-based, stressing the defense of culture, family, and regional autonomy. The government is repeatedly branded as "lying" and "passive."

The political position is strongly opposed to the ideas of the extreme green transition, which call animal farming into question and promote urbanization. The speaker emphasizes the vital, value-based importance of promoting rural development and ensuring food security, prioritizing these goals over opposing policies. He/She warns that these extreme visions are genuinely on the table in the Riigikogu (Parliament) and require political opposition.

The political platform is fiercely opposed to the government’s social policy, prioritizing the defense of subsidies for large families and the mitigation of the demographic crisis. This position is strongly value-driven, underscoring the constitutional duty to protect multi-child families and criticizing the minister’s actions as inflicting irreparable harm upon Estonia. The speaker demands that the benefits be reinstated and that a sense of security be established for families with children.