By Plenary Sessions: Riina Solman

Economic views are expressed through social benefits, where there is strong support for increasing benefits for families with many children and opposition to their reduction. This indicates a preference for greater social redistribution and a larger scope of state support.

The economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially regarding the motor vehicle tax, which is deemed unfair. The speaker expresses concern over the state of business organizations and asks whether they require subsidies or are merely voicing concerns about the economic situation.

The economic platform focuses on easing the tax burden for socially vulnerable groups. The speaker is vehemently opposed to new taxes (like the car tax) and previous cuts to benefits that impact large families. The preference is for targeted tax exemptions designed to achieve specific social objectives.

The speaker is opposed to new taxes, specifically the car tax, especially given the fuel price hike expected in 2027 resulting from the European Union Emissions Trading System, which essentially constitutes a new form of transport taxation. He/She views the car tax as excessive taxation on the transport sector and questions whether it is necessary at all if environmental objectives can be achieved through other mechanisms.

The economic stance centers on financing national defense, backing the issuance of a defense loan to fulfill General Herem's recommendations. This demonstrates a willingness to increase the state's debt burden in order to rapidly achieve critical security priorities. Ensuring security is prioritized over immediate fiscal discipline.

The speaker is concerned about the rising unemployment rate and opposes the introduction of cheap labor as a solution for stimulating the economy. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive economic analysis that accounts for expenditures in the social sector. This position expresses concern for the protection of the domestic labor market and workforce.