Session Profile: Riina Solman
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-10-22
Political Position
A strong, value-based focus on supporting children and families, particularly valuing large families, which is consistent with Isamaa's long-term program. Critical of government signals that could negatively impact families, citing the introduction of the car tax as an example. It also emphasizes personal freedoms and reducing bureaucratic hurdles related to name changes.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates expertise in family and population policy, highlighting the role of state messaging and recognition. Has detailed knowledge regarding the administrative and security aspects of name changes, citing specific cases (Kaur Hanson) and administrative court precedents. Addresses parenthood as a "second workday," underscoring the importance of its proper valuation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is formal and respectful (when addressing the Chair and the Minister), yet simultaneously passionate about supporting families. The speaker employs both emotional appeals (referencing difficult circumstances/hardship, the need for a second job) and political arguments (such as the signals sent by the state). When questioning the Minister, the style is direct and solution-oriented, focusing on providing aid to specific individuals.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data is only available for one plenary session, during which three speeches were delivered. There is insufficient data regarding patterns or frequency.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at senior politicians in Stenbock House and the ministries, who are sending negative signals to families, particularly concerning the planned car tax. The opposition is based on values and policy, not personal animosity. He/She also criticizes the rigid approach taken by officials regarding name change issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Expresses strong support and warmly recommends endorsing the draft legislation introduced by colleagues, noting a willingness to cooperate on matters of family policy. Addresses the Minister to seek assistance and counsel in resolving a specific citizen's administrative issue. Emphasizes the necessity of supporting parenthood "all together."
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is predominantly on the national level (the Riigikogu, state leaders, ministries) and the cultural sphere (Estonian-style vs. German-style names). Specific local or regional topics are absent.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It opposes measures that increase the financial burden on families, such as the car tax, which sends a negative signal. It supports cheap or financially neutral signals provided by the state (such as showing appreciation or observing flag days) that recognize parenthood as work. Furthermore, it criticizes the financial burden placed on a young person with a difficult background when they have to take the state to court.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is strongly placed on family values, the appreciation of children and parenthood, and supporting families with many children. It addresses personal freedoms and identity within the context of name changes, advocating for flexibility when permitting German-style names. Furthermore, it raises the public safety question concerning the prevention of name changes by pedophiles and child abusers.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary priority is supporting legislation that provides time for families with children and valuing parenthood. The secondary focus is improving administrative legislation concerning name changes to reduce bureaucracy while ensuring that criminals cannot misuse name change provisions.
3 Speeches Analyzed