Session Profile: Riina Solman
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
2025-01-21
Political Position
The political focus centers on the management of national defense and the criticism directed at the decisions made by the ruling party (the Reform Party). The speaker expresses strong indignation regarding the unexpected resignation of the head of the Defense League (Kaitseliit) and accuses the elite of cronyism. He positions himself as standing with the people, embracing "populism" as a condemnation of the elite. The overall stance is highly critical of the government's leadership style concerning national defense matters.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding national defense and the Defense League, citing specific events like the Defense League anniversary, and naming key leaders (Riho Ühtegi, Herem, Pevkur). Their personal involvement as a member of the Women's Voluntary Defence Organization (Naiskodukaitse) lends authority and insider knowledge to the subjects discussed. They are also able to describe the internal friction between the Minister of Defense and the head of the Defense League.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, questioning, and at times confrontational, particularly when directed at the Reform Party. Emotional appeals are used, referencing the public's indignation and commending a colleague for standing on the side of the people. The speaker engages in political labeling, leveling accusations of "cronyism" and criticizing the coalition's low participation in the discussion.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker refers to previous engagement, including participation in the anniversary event of the Kaitseliit (Estonian Defence League) and interaction with members of the defence forces. The current pattern of activity involves active participation in the Riigikogu plenary session, posing pointed questions to the rapporteur and demanding answers.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition has been leveled against the Reform Party’s leadership decisions and the poor attendance of their politicians at a crucial debate. The criticism targets the elite’s cronyism and leadership style, which raises serious questions concerning national defense. The speaker demands that the Reform Party leadership clarify their expectations regarding the national defense bill.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker commends his colleague (Urmas) for taking the side of the people, demonstrating a willingness to support others who criticize the behavior of the elite. He also notes the presence in the chamber of representatives from other parties (Eesti 200, Helmen Kütt, Raimond Kaljulaid), suggesting a topic-specific interest that transcends the coalition lines.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the draft bill addressing national defense requirements, for which the leadership of the Reform Party is being held clearly accountable. The speaker is actively questioning and setting expectations during the debate on the bill, stressing the draft law's direct link to the party's executive decisions.
3 Speeches Analyzed