Agenda Profile: Riina Solman
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) - first reading
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political focus centers on opposing gender quotas in management bodies, viewing them as controversial and ineffective in closing the gender pay gap. The preference is to champion the fight for equal pay rather than implement quotas, and there is a strong push to address the need for regulation regarding gender self-determination. These positions are deeply value-driven, casting doubt on state intervention in social matters.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the content of the Ministry of Social Affairs’ earlier plans (gender self-determination) and the explanatory memorandum of the draft legislation, referencing the connection between the wage gap and quotas. They utilize their prior experience as Minister of Population Affairs to support claims concerning the behavior of minorities (transgender individuals). They also raise regulatory questions related to international sports scandals.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is initially respectful towards the minister but quickly turns confrontational and provocative. Emotionally charged examples (e.g., a transgender boxer, bullying funded by state money) and personal experience are used to call into question the minister's ability to solve complex social problems. The speaker repeatedly asks challenging questions regarding specific regulations.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity consists of intensive participation in a single Riigikogu session, addressing three consecutive questions or comments to the minister. This suggests active intervention in the flow of the debate and a clear desire to keep these issues on the agenda.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the Ministry of Social Affairs’ policy regarding gender quotas and gender self-determination. The criticism is sharp, including accusations concerning the former Minister of Social Protection’s plans and the alleged bullying behavior towards minorities (transgender individuals). They oppose the idea that social problems will resolve themselves without clear regulatory measures.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is primarily confrontational with the Minister, demanding concrete answers to complex regulatory questions. Agreement is expressed with the colleague (Annely Akkermann) regarding her stance on the happiness of female top executives, which suggests selective support.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national regulations (Estonian laws and the activities of the Ministry of Social Affairs) and international examples (the Paris Olympic Games, the worldwide scandal). There is absolutely no reference to local or regional issues within Estonia.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on reducing the gender pay gap through the fight for equal pay, rather than through quotas for management boards. Quotas are viewed as an ineffective means of solving the pay gap, with a preference for more direct intervention in wage policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is strongly critical of gender self-determination policy, demanding its regulation, particularly in the context of sports. Concern is expressed about the detriment caused to women, and it is alleged that transgender individuals may use public funds to bully and threaten others. This position demonstrates strong opposition to the current social policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on opposing the quota mechanism proposed in the draft amendment (Bill 588 SE) to the Securities Market Act. As an alternative, the proposal suggests enshrining the fight for equal pay within corporate boards and demands the regulation of the issue of gender self-determination.
3 Speeches Analyzed