Agenda Profile: Riina Solman
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position is one of strong opposition to the supplementary budget bill, stemming from a fundamental lack of confidence in the government's financial management. The focus highlights the contradiction between the government’s previous promises and the current reality, especially regarding the financial pledges made during the 2023 elections. The overall framework is based primarily on a deficit of competence and trust.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of state finance and tax policy, specifically referencing the impacts of abolishing the tax hump and the resulting budget holes. This expertise is supported by the use of tables and assessments published by the Ministry of Finance to refute the opposing side's claims.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and confrontational, employing direct accusations of obfuscation and deceit. The speaker combines emotional matters of trust with logical, data-driven arguments, citing official tables. The tone is skeptical and demanding.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in parliamentary debates, referencing previous question times and discussions held in the Riigikogu. Furthermore, he/she monitors and responds to the opposition's communication in the media (Vikerraadio, Õhtuleht).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is aimed at the Minister of Finance and the government, who are accused of systematic misrepresentation and the abuse of trust. The criticism is intense, focusing both on personal credibility (election-time promises) and political consequences (a persistent budget deficit).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no data regarding cooperation or readiness for compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is entirely at the national level and concerns public finance and tax policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal responsibility and criticize policies which, according to the Ministry of Finance, create a persistent budget deficit. The speaker opposes the abolition of the tax hump, arguing that it primarily benefits the wealthy rather than low-wage earners.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on contesting the draft State Supplementary Budget Act of 2024 (456 SE) and subjecting its reliability to scrutiny. Attention is also being paid to analyzing the impacts of tax legislation (the abolition of the tax hump).
1 Speeches Analyzed