Session Profile: Pipi-Liis Siemann
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-06-11
Political Position
The political stance is strongly supportive of the draft amendment to the Courts Act, which is considered a crucial initiative that must definitely be moved forward with. The focus is on policy implementation and the success of engagement, emphasizing the judiciary's positive reception of the draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence regarding the work of the Constitutional Committee and the processing of legislation concerning the judicial system. This expertise is reflected in the precise reporting of the dates of the sittings, the institutions involved, and the number of amendments proposed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and fact-based, focusing on the detailed reporting of the Constitutional Committee's work to the plenary session. The address is logical and procedural, avoiding emotional appeals, and is aimed at both colleagues and the public.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of activity demonstrate active participation in legislative committee work, involving the processing of the draft legislation during two sessions (June 2nd and 3rd). This pattern encompasses regular and detailed reporting regarding the preparation of the bill and consensus-based procedural decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
No data available.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing an extensive engagement process involving the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs and representatives of institutions. All procedural decisions within the committee, including placing the draft bill on the agenda, were made by consensus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
No data available
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data available
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
No data available.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the draft bill amending the Courts Act, a bill for which the speaker is both a proponent and the person responsible for managing the proceedings. Significant progress has been achieved with the submission of six proposed amendments and a consensus decision to bring the bill to the final vote on June 18th.
1 Speeches Analyzed