Session Profile: Pipi-Liis Siemann
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
2025-09-10
Political Position
The political stance centers on restrictions regarding candidacy in local elections. As a representative of the leading committee, he proposes rejecting the draft bill, while simultaneously acknowledging that the problem (the so-called "decoy candidate touring") exists and requires more extensive discussion. He emphasizes long-term reliance on population register entries as sufficient proof of connection to the place of residence. The position is primarily procedural and policy-based, stressing the continuity of the existing legal framework.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the work and procedural protocols of the Constitutional Committee, detailing the progress of the draft legislation's discussion, the consultation process regarding the government's positions, and the final procedural recommendations. He addresses the legal aspects of suffrage and the definition of residence, referencing the role of official registration and recent developments within the legal framework. Furthermore, he is well aware of the practical deficiencies within local governments, noting specifically that parish secretaries fail to verify the actual place of residence.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and procedural, focusing on the neutral conveyance of the commission's work and procedural decisions. Following the official review, he/she permits the expression of a personal, logic-based opinion, emphasizing the significance of the legal framework and historical practices. The language is clear and factual, avoiding emotional appeals.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the plenary session, presenting as the representative of the Constitutional Committee's lead committee. His mode of operation involves the swift communication of committee decisions and responding to questions, citing previous work within the committee (the discussion held on June 17th).
10 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The direct opposition is aimed at the draft bill currently under discussion, which the commission recommended rejecting because it does not offer a sufficiently well-considered solution. He/She also criticizes the practical shortcomings of the current system, noting that rural municipality and city secretaries are not interested in verifying the actual place of residence. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is committee-centric, emphasizing lengthy deliberation and the thorough consideration of various issues (e.g., connection to the community, the topic of decoy ducks) by the committee members. He conveys the committee's consensus procedural decisions, noting that six members voted in favor of rejecting the draft proposal.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly on the local level, addressing municipal elections, the candidate's ties to the community, and the determination of their place of residence. It directly references the role of rural municipality and city secretaries in verifying residency.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on proposed amendments to the Election Act concerning the residency requirements for candidates for local government. The speaker supports rejecting the current draft but sees the need for some regulation that would require genuine commitment to the municipality and prevent the "touring" of so-called political decoys.
10 Speeches Analyzed