Session Profile: Pipi-Liis Siemann
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
2025-01-30
Political Position
The speaker's position is procedural and legal, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to constitutional requirements when restricting suffrage. He conveys the committee's stance to reject the draft bill, as the prevailing understanding dictates amending the Constitution itself, rather than merely amending the Local Government Council Election Act. The formulation of this position is strongly oriented toward political and legal norms.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of constitutional law and legislative procedures, detailing the legal requirements for restricting voting rights. Specific emphasis is placed on the legal weight and correctness of the Riigikogu's legislative instruments (declaration versus decision). He/She accurately communicates the government's stance and the committee's procedural rulings.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker's style is highly formal and neutral, focusing exclusively on conveying procedures and the committee's decisions. Logical appeals are employed, referencing government positions and the results of the committee vote, entirely devoid of emotional expression. The presentation itself is comprehensive and detailed, capturing the nuances of the discussion.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in the work process of the Riigikogu's leading committee (the Constitutional Committee), presenting to the plenary session as the committee's rapporteur. This pattern of activity includes providing thorough reports on the committee's discussions and procedural decisions, with specific reference to dates (January 14).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the legislative path chosen by the bill's initiator, not at the objective of the bill itself. The criticism is procedural because, in the assessment of the government and the committee majority, amending the Local Government Council Election Act is insufficient for restricting suffrage. The committee proposed rejecting the draft bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates cooperation within the committee framework, neutrally conveying both the initiator's comprehensive overview and the government's position not to support the draft legislation. The style of cooperation is fact-based and procedure-centric, reflecting the voting results of the committee members (6 in favor, 2 against, 1 abstention).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker addresses the social issue concerning the restriction of voting rights, stressing the supremacy of constitutional limitations when regulating this matter. Although the commission understood the initiator's objective (likely related to Russia's terrorist regime), it was emphasized that implementing this measure would necessitate amending the constitution.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus centers on the legal basis for restricting suffrage and the necessity of amending the constitution. The speaker, acting as a representative of the leading committee, supports the motion to reject the draft bill, citing legal inaccuracies. The legal weight of the Riigikogu statements was also discussed.
1 Speeches Analyzed