Session Profile: Pipi-Liis Siemann
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-03-06
Political Position
The political focus centers on the draft legislation regarding the compatibility of holding office as a member of the Riigikogu and a member of a local government council, an issue framed primarily as a legal and procedural matter. The speaker acknowledges a personal conflict of interest but neutrally conveys the committee's stance, which inclined toward rejecting the draft. This position is based more on policy and procedure, citing earlier practices and the Supreme Court's assessment.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates mastery over the work of the Constitutional Committee and parliamentary procedure, detailing the treatment of the draft bill and the procedural decisions made. This expertise encompasses knowledge of the repeated consideration of legislative drafts, discussions concerning the relevance of the government's stance, and the incorporation of previous assessments issued by the Supreme Court.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is highly formal, neutral, and descriptive, focusing on the precise reporting of the events, discussions, and voting results of the Constitutional Committee session. Logical appeals are employed, referencing specific dates, voting outcomes, and procedural decisions, entirely devoid of emotional or personal judgments.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu as the representative of the lead committee, reporting on the committee’s procedural decisions and the substance of the debates. This pattern of activity involves attending committee meetings (e.g., September 14, 2023) and subsequently relaying the outcomes to the plenary.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct opposition to a specific political group or individual. The speaker describes disagreements within the committee (e.g., regarding the rejection of the draft bill and the relevance of the government's opinion), but does so within the framework of neutral procedural reporting.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The mode of cooperation is institutional and procedural, operating as a representative unanimously appointed by the Steering Commission. The cooperation involved a discussion with the representative of the Government of the Republic and a subsequent vote among the commission members, whereby the discussion resulted in differing viewpoints remaining concerning the compatibility of the offices.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on harmonizing governance structures at the national and local levels (the Riigikogu and local government councils), which indicates an interest in administrative organization. There are no references to specific regions, projects, or local economic issues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on constitutional matters and the regulation governing the compatibility of political offices. The speaker, acting as the representative of the leading committee, is tasked with conveying the proposal to reject the draft bill, thus becoming procedurally bound to opposing the legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed