Agenda Profile: Pipi-Liis Siemann
Draft law amending the Courts Act and other related acts (to enhance court administration) - second reading (632 SE)
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the draft bill (632 SE) aimed at streamlining court administration, emphasizing its importance and the absolute necessity of moving forward with the proceedings. This position is both policy-based and procedural, focusing on the successful preparation of the bill and the broad involvement of stakeholders. The speaker stresses that the judiciary has received the draft bill positively.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates authority in legislative procedures and the work of the Constitutional Committee, referencing specific session dates (June 2 and 3) and procedural decisions. This expertise is connected to amendments to the Courts Act and the management of the engagement process, highlighting the hearing of opinions from the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs and other institutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker's style is formal, informative, and procedural, typical of a commission rapporteur. The tone is neutral and logical, focusing on the communication of facts and the outcomes of the commission's work, emphasizing the scope of engagement and consensual decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in legislative work, particularly within the Constitutional Committee, providing a detailed report on the proceedings of two sessions (June 2nd and 3rd). This mode of operation involves regular, structured reporting on procedural progress, as well as planning future plenary agendas (June 11th and 18th).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The working style is open and consensus-based, emphasizing an extensive engagement process where both the Minister of Justice and the Digital Minister, as well as representatives from the institutions that provided input, were heard. All procedural decisions made within the committee (including proposals for adopting the agenda and concluding the reading) were unanimous, which indicates successful cooperation among colleagues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft Act amending the Courts Act and consequently amending other acts (Bill 632 SE), the purpose of which is to enhance the efficiency of court administration. The speaker, acting as the representative of the Constitutional Committee, is the proponent leading the proceedings. They submitted six amendments to the bill and proposed concluding the second reading.
1 Speeches Analyzed