By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The rhetorical style is polite and formal, employing salutations such as "Esteemed Chair" and "Dear Presenter." The tone is inquisitive and businesslike, focusing on the logical need for information to identify new problems.

The style is critical, detailed, and highly argumentative, focusing on logical and procedural appeals. Strong and emotional language is employed to describe the negative consequences (e.g., "cosmic," "killing off rural life," "councils being held hostage"). Sharp rhetorical questions are posed to cast doubt on the coalition's motives and decision-making processes.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and emotional, employing strong judgments such as "colossal mess" and "completely absurd." The speaker combines procedural criticism (regarding the committee chairman's leadership skills) with ideological appeals, addressing the coalition directly ("Dear friends, squirrels!"). Historical quotes are used to emphasize the coalition's fundamental deviation from its principles.

The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, employing strong negative phrasing (e.g., "tax cascade," "truly insane" land tax, "dawdling"). A logical appeal is utilized, referencing previous warnings and comparisons to neighboring countries. The speaker poses pointed questions to the ministers, demanding explanations regarding the government's inaction or mistakes.