By Plenary Sessions: Priit Sibul

The style is formal and interrogative, focusing on clarifying political positions and the details of the draft bill. The tone is concerned about the future of the Estonian language and firm in its opposition to increasing the quota. The speaker employs a logical approach, seeking factual clarity regarding the content and validity of the language requirements.

The rhetorical style is passionate, critical, and pressing, highlighting the conflict between the decisions made and the actual level of threat. Both logical arguments (budget criteria, the expiration of the security tax) and emotional appeals are employed, urging the coalition to take heed and follow through on decisions with actions, not just rhetoric.

The rhetorical style is probing, aggressive, and demanding, using direct questions to pinpoint responsibility ("Whose decision was this, exactly?"). The speaker intersperses detailed, fact-based arguments (dates, protocols) with sarcastic remarks, comparing the situation to a Kreisiraadio sketch and referring to 1.5 million euros as something that is not "just 3.50 tucked into a hoodie pocket." The overall tone is critical and expresses outrage.