Agenda Profile: Priit Sibul
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE)
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Political Position
The focus is on the legislative process, inquiring about the future and viability of a specific draft bill (the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act). No specific support for or opposition to the bill is expressed; the position is rather evaluative and inquisitive. The focus is on procedural aspects and effectiveness, not on a value-based framework.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and courteous, addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur respectfully. The rhetoric is direct and focuses on a specific question concerning the fate of the draft legislation, emphasizing the simplicity of the matter. Emotional or complex logical arguments are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She takes the floor during the first reading of the draft legislation to address one specific question. This pattern indicates participation in the legislative debate in the role of an interrogator.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is polite and respectful, involving direct address to the presenter to obtain information. The tone is open to dialogue and the gathering of knowledge regarding the viability of the draft proposal.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation relating to local government elections. Specific regions or local projects are not emphasized.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the draft Act amending the Local Government Council Election Act (287 SE). The role is primarily that of an inquirer and assessor, who wants to know the future status of the draft Act.
1 Speeches Analyzed