Session Profile: Enn Eesmaa
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
2025-01-30
Political Position
The political position is focused on emphasizing the role of the people's representative and ensuring the transparency of the legislative process. The speaker stresses the privilege of members of parliament to possess comprehensive information (the draft bill and the explanatory memorandum), noting that this information should also be accessible to the public. The position is rather procedural and value-based, highlighting the obligations of the elected representative.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The expertise is related to legislative procedures and comparative law, specifically referencing the existence of the draft law and its lengthy explanatory memorandum. The speaker shows interest in solving problems in similar countries, asking about the experiences of Latvia and Lithuania.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, emphasizing the legitimacy of his actions as a representative of the people. The speaker uses a logical appeal to highlight the differences in awareness between Parliament and the public, and requests a comparative analysis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the question phase of the plenary session, focusing on the content and context of the bill.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
While there is no direct opposition, the speaker indirectly points to an issue concerning the transparency of the legislative process, noting that the public cannot access the details of the draft bill. The criticism is aimed more at a procedural deficiency than at a specific political adversary.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style is formal and institutional, manifesting itself in questions posed to the rapporteur during the plenary session. There is no data available regarding inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is clearly directed toward international comparison, emphasizing similarities and solutions found in Latvia and Lithuania. This suggests a desire to utilize the experience of the Baltic states within the context of domestic legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on the handling of a specific bill and the associated transparency concerns. The priority is to ensure that the bill's context and proposed solution are comparable to the practices observed in similar nations.
1 Speeches Analyzed