By Months: Enn Eesmaa

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

2 Speeches

The style is generally formal and analytical, beginning presentations with polite words of thanks to the speaker and emphasizing the importance of structure. The speaker employs logical arguments (such as the example of Finland) and raises questions regarding strategic cooperation, maintaining a tone that is rather constructive and exploratory.
Details View Details
09.2025

3 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal, informative, and procedural, which is typical for the presentation of a draft bill. The tone is authoritative and measured, focusing on facts, the specifics of the legislative procedure, and highlighting the commission's unanimous decision. The initial speech includes a brief, apolitical, and cultural observation regarding the Hungarian manner of discourse.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

The address is formal and respectful ("Honored Rapporteur," "Thank you very much"), focusing on the logical and procedural framing of the issue. The style is analytical, emphasizing the Member of Parliament's duty to ensure public awareness and introducing a comparative argument.
Details View Details
12.2024

3 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and fact-based, making it appropriate for the rapporteur of the leading committee addressing the Riigikogu. The tone is neutral and informative, relying heavily on logical arguments, dates, and consensus decisions. The speaker emphasizes accuracy, correcting a colleague's statement regarding the size of Estonia's financial contribution.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the conveyance of facts. The speech is structured as a report, utilizing respectful forms of address toward the Riigikogu and the Minister ("Honorable colleagues! Esteemed Minister!"). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on logical and administrative information.
Details View Details
09.2024

2 Speeches

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, employing direct questions directed at the minister and referencing institutional roles. The tone remains respectful, yet conveys sincere regret concerning the unsuccessful attempt to establish a new tradition of dialogue within the parliament. The appeal itself is primarily logical and procedural in nature.
Details View Details
07.2024

1 Speeches

The style is formal and serious, centered on discussing "grand themes." The speaker adopts the role of a facilitator to ensure that the content of complex political documents (the coalition agreement) is accessible to the wider audience and the public. The tone is analytical and aimed at substantive discussion.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

The style is highly formal, procedural, and objective, focusing on the detailed reporting of the work of the National Defence Committee and the history of the draft legislation. The speaker employs logical argumentation and relies on facts and the positions of the ministries, avoiding emotional appeals. The language is complex and frequently references laws and procedural decisions.
Details View Details
05.2024

2 Speeches

The tone is initially polite and appreciative towards the colleague ("sincere thanks"), but shifts to critical and personal when the suitability of the glass pavilion is discussed. The speaker employs rhetorical questions to challenge earlier decisions, expressing their opposition intensely and directly.
Details View Details
04.2024

1 Speeches

The register is formal and polite, starting with an acknowledgement of a colleague and deliberately steering clear of an accusatory tone. Simultaneously, a rhetorical technique is utilized, referencing the opposing representative's prior role as a minister to underscore their accountability for problems that remain unresolved. The style is questioning and centered on demanding logical responsibility.
Details View Details
03.2024

1 Speeches

The speaker's style is apologetic and self-critical, acknowledging a technical error or awkwardness with the phrase "my fingers were nervous." The tone is informal and human, focusing on alleviating the momentary discomfort or mistake.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling